What qualities should members of an ADC Jury possess?

Members of an ADC Jury should embody integrity, objectivity, impartiality, and honesty because these qualities are essential for ensuring a fair and just evaluation process. Their role involves making critical judgments regarding architectural design and proposals, and possessing these attributes is vital to upholding the credibility and reliability of the jury's decisions.

Integrity fosters trust among all participants, allowing architects to believe that their work is being assessed fairly. Objectivity ensures that evaluations are based on merit rather than personal opinions or biases, while impartiality allows jurors to consider submissions without preconceived judgments. Honesty is crucial in providing transparent feedback and making decisions that reflect the true standards of excellence within the architectural field.

While experience in teaching architecture, financial knowledge, or technical expertise in engineering can contribute to a jury member's background, the foundational principles of integrity, objectivity, impartiality, and honesty directly relate to the ethical standards and best practices expected of jury members in their evaluations. Thus, these qualities are paramount to the effectiveness and integrity of the ADC Jury.