What type of selection may be conducted by committees representing institutions?

Comparative selection is a process that involves evaluating multiple options or candidates against specific criteria to identify the most suitable choice. This approach allows committees to assess the strengths and weaknesses of various candidates or proposals based on pre-defined standards, ensuring a more thorough and informed decision-making process. This method is particularly useful in institutional settings where diverse factors must be weighed, such as qualifications, experience, and suitability for the role.

In contrast, single selection focuses on choosing one candidate without comparing them to others, random selection entails selecting options by chance without any systematic evaluation, and direct negotiation involves reaching an agreement through discussions rather than through a comparative evaluation process. Therefore, comparative selection is important in institutional contexts where comprehensive assessment can lead to better outcomes.