Which classification best describes 'Architectural Firm' under Philippine law?

The classification of 'Architectural Firm' under Philippine law as a juristic entity capable of signing contracts is correct because it acknowledges the legal recognition and standing that an architectural firm holds within the context of the law. As a juristic entity, an architectural firm can engage in professional activities, enter into contracts, and take legal responsibility for its actions and obligations. This legal capacity allows the firm to operate independently and be recognized as a separate entity from its individual members or architects.

In contrast, a sole proprietor managing individual projects lacks the formal structure and collective legal recognition that a firm possesses. Informal groups of architects do not have the legal standing necessary to enter into contracts, and a governmental agency is not an architectural firm, but rather an entity involved in oversight and regulation of the architecture profession. Therefore, the classification of an architectural firm as a juristic entity is essential in understanding its operational authority and responsibilities under Philippine law.